Imagine a platform for compliance costing $12,000 annually. Does that sound expensive?
The answer will depend on the product it replaces.
If you invest $12,000 to reduce the time spent in the repetitive gathering of evidence across an intricate technological landscape, it could be money that is well-invested. If a small business of seven people could gather the same data manually in a few hours each month, the figure will be very different.
That’s a useful way to approach the search for a Vanta alternative. Don’t begin by asking what platform has the greatest features. Ask your company about how these tools can help you save time and money.
The Break-Even Point for Automation
Automation of compliance isn’t necessarily either good or negative. The benefits of compliance automation is dependent on the size of the business. Imagine a company growing in technology with hundreds of employees, many cloud environments, many applications, and regular access changes. Manually collecting evidence could be a major burden for the operation. Integrations that automately monitor systems and collect evidence may easily justify their expense.
Now consider a 10-person startup preparing for its first SOC 2. Its infrastructure may be relatively compact, and evidence collection could remain manageable without extensive automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this distinction. The capabilities of a sophisticated platform are amazing, however they can only be of value in the event that an organization requires them.
Compare Architecture not just Brands
Finding Vanta or Drata quickly turns into a feature by -feature exercise. Both platforms are built upon automation and are integrated and therefore, companies seeking this kind of solution can benefit by looking at the frameworks they support, their integrations and service as well as individual quotations and contracts.
There’s another decision to make first, however. Do you think your business is ready for an integration-driven platform for compliance at all? Certain companies would like constant monitoring as well as automated evidence collection. Some prefer to provide evidence by themselves, especially when the workload remains modest.
Vanta Competitors do not all use the same model
A number of famous Vanta competitors compete within an identical category that is focused on automation. There are also platforms that are less heavy that concentrate on organization over extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist is a part of this group. CertAssist was created by internal auditors and compliance consultants. It combines framework controls into a central workspace and allows for editing of guidelines for policy as well as evidence. Auditors can review the evidence submitted through a read-only interface.
It does not install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers are able to upload the evidence they prefer.
Be aware of the system access.
Removal of integrations comes with an obvious disadvantage: someone must collect evidence manually.
The compliance software does not require any integration and can be used without having to establish connection to the operational environment.
The designs of either are not superior to each other. It is crucial to determine what tradeoffs are appropriate for your business.
CertAssist is targeted towards teams that have between five and 200 employees and provides pricing information instead of having an actual sales call. The stated launch price for CertAssist per month is $225 instead of the standard $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Place
What is required of a startup that has 10 employees aren’t necessarily identical to those of a company with 100 or 500 employees.
A light platform may be beneficial while compliance stays simple. As employees, systems, frameworks, and requirements for evidence grow, the economics will eventually favor deeper automation. Let complexity take its place when buying compliance technologies.
Do not pay for 50 integrations because they appear impressive in a chart of comparison. They’re well worth the money in situations where the task they take over is more costly than performing them manually.
